8 hours ago 7

What the Supreme Court’s Ruling Will Mean for Birthright Citizenship

You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

The ruling left unsettled the question of whether children born to immigrants without full legal status in the United States are entitled to automatic citizenship. So what happens now?

A woman holds a child carrying a U.S. flag, while she holds a sign reading, “American-born children are American children.”
Protesters outside the U.S. Supreme Court last month as the justices considered injunctions against President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship.Credit...Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

Miriam Jordan

By Miriam Jordan

Miriam Jordan is a national immigration correspondent.

June 27, 2025, 9:03 p.m. ET

On his first day in office, President Trump issued an executive order intended to end birthright citizenship, a foundational principle that grants U.S. citizenship to all children born on U.S. soil. That right has been enshrined in the Constitution for more than 160 years.

Lawsuits challenging the directive were swiftly filed, and judges in several states issued nationwide injunctions to stop the order from going into effect. But on Friday, the Supreme Court sided largely with the Trump administration. Though it did not rule on the constitutionality of the executive order on birthright citizenship, it did reject the nationwide injunctions that had blocked the order — clearing the way for it to be applied, at least temporarily, in a majority of states.

That leaves a lot of questions. Will babies born to undocumented immigrants in some states be entitled to citizenship, but not in others? Can children born to such parents in states where the order is in effect be deported? Will a new court challenge start the argument all over again?

Nothing is certain. But here’s a look at how the next chapter of the debate is likely to unfold.

No. Immigrant rights groups and 22 states, all with Democratic leadership, had sued over the birthright citizenship order, and three federal district courts vacated the policy. Among those states were Arizona, California, Maryland, New York, North Carolina and Washington. Challengers in those states will most likely try again.

In 28 states that had not challenged the order, such as Arkansas, Mississippi, North Dakota and Texas, the order can go into effect. But the Supreme Court imposed a 30-day delay before that can happen, leaving time for any new legal maneuvers.

While the Supreme Court rejected the ability of a single federal judge to block enforcement of a presidential order across the country, the justices did carve out other legal pathways for those trying to challenge an executive order such as the birthright citizenship measure.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Read Entire Article

From Twitter

Comments